Ron Siegel

9.3

08’s are drinking well. This just needed some air showing mostly black fruit, graphite, spice, leather & sweet tobacco. — 9 days ago

Ron Siegel

9.4

Classy showing dark plum, red & black fruits with graphite, cedar, leather, mocha, earth & tobacco. — 14 days ago

Somm David T

Independent Sommelier/Wine Educator

9.4

Earlier I wrote about the 06 vintage, saying it was just good to very good depending on producer and terroir. Angelus is a producer that delivered in the very good range with their 2006.

The nose is subtle with just being poured from a freshly opened bottle. Yet, ripe & lush; black currants, blackberries, black raspberries, black plum, black cherries, anise to some light black licorice, dark chocolate baking bar, milk chocolate tones, dark rich earth, some nicely layered, soft baking spices, hues of sage, dark, withering dark flowers.

The palate is lush with M powdery tannins. Ripe & lush; core of black currants, blackberries, black raspberries, both plums, black cherries, black cherries with over tones of blueberries & strawberries. Anise to some light black licorice, dark chocolate baking bar, milk chocolate notes, understated caramel, some nicely layered, soft baking spices-cinnamon, nutmeg, clove & vanillin, really soft dark spices, mocha powder, hues of sage, dark rich earth dark, dry top soil, just moist clay, sandalwood, fresh tobacco, used leather, light graphite, withering dark flowers & red roses, framed in violets & light lavender, excellent acidity, nice soft tension/struture, well balanced-knitted, perfect elegance and finishes over two-minutes falling on fruits and soft earthiness.

This is still ascending and has 15 plus yrs of good drinking ahead but it is in a good spot today.

It is a solid 94+. The plus with another 3-5 yrs.

Paired with Lamb Salounah Gulf-Style Braised Lamb with Vegetables, served with Butter Rice.

Blind this would fool a number of people off the Right Bank.

@Ek225 — 23 days ago

Conrad Green

9.4

Very polished fruit. Great balance. Sophisticated and a little understated. Silky and in place. Very good, but lean in… this wine doesn’t shout — 11 days ago

with Peter, Gregg and 1 other

Ron Siegel

9.4

1st time trying the 16 vintage. This was impressive with its balance & finesse that drank beautifully from start to finish — 7 days ago

David Kline

9.4

This. A warm meat log. Perfection. Still has the notes without the “dust”. — 8 days ago

with David

Todd Anderson

9.3

A lovely wine that is drinking very lovely right now. I personally like 14.5% wines vs the big jammy versions for their balance so this fits my tastes perfectly. Very glad I bought a futures case back in the day. Enjoy sooner rather than later. Cheers! — 17 days ago

Jan A

9.8

Petrus 1975... It was a very tannic year apparently. This was still as fresh like a 30 year younger wine! — 13 days ago

Raun Kupiec

9.0

First bottle corked. Luckily able to pull another from the cellar to compare. What a difference! Great learning when you can compare. Black cherry, smooth, decent acidity, very soft tannins. First bottle was wet cardboard. — 15 days ago

with Barbara

Marta Jackowska

9.5

Solid but lacked the wow factor we were expecting for a 2005 vintage. Or, maybe we’ve just become really picky with all the nice wine we’ve been drinking?! 🤔
Nice smooth texture and a strong dark chocolate taste. Really good wine but didn’t blow us away. — 14 days ago

with Neville