Podere Brizio

Brunello di Montalcino Sangiovese

9.16 ratings
9.32 pro ratings
Montalcino, Siena, Tuscany, Italy
Sangiovese
Mushrooms, Manchego & Parmesan, Beef, Venison, White Rice, Potato, Exotic Spices, Baking Spices, Pasta, Herbs, Beans & Peas, Hard Cheese, Pungent Cheese, Chicken, Salami & Prosciutto, Soft Cheese, Duck, Tomato-Based, Pork, Chili & Hot Spicy, Lamb, Turkey, Onion, Shallot, Garlic
Top Notes For
Paco Suro

Good tannic structure. Light to medium. Young. Can enjoy now or really enjoy in a few more years.

Good tannic structure. Light to medium. Young. Can enjoy now or really enjoy in a few more years.

Nov 18th, 2023
Wulf Losee

2017 opened April 2024. Herbal nose. Red raspberries on the front. Watery tannic structure with lots of sour high notes on the mid palate and back palate with nothing to balance them. The finish is long but astringent and bitter. i’m gonna let this breathe for another hour or so – maybe it will get better. But for now it’s sort of meh. If it improves, I’ll up my rating. If it doesn’t, I may dial my rating down a notch or two.

Update: I gave this wine an hour to breathe in a decanter, and most of the harsh edges that I complained about disappeared. Some of the fruit remain on the front. The watery tannic structure remained watery, but it became smoother. The finish shortened considerably as all the bitter astringent notes disappeared. This wine became inoffensive and boring when it opened up. I’ll leave my rating at 8.7. Double meh.

2017 opened April 2024. Herbal nose. Red raspberries on the front. Watery tannic structure with lots of sour high notes on the mid palate and back palate with nothing to balance them. The finish is long but astringent and bitter. i’m gonna let this breathe for another hour or so – maybe it will get better. But for now it’s sort of meh. If it improves, I’ll up my rating. If it doesn’t, I may dial my rating down a notch or two.

Update: I gave this wine an hour to breathe in a decanter, and most of the harsh edges that I complained about disappeared. Some of the fruit remain on the front. The watery tannic structure remained watery, but it became smoother. The finish shortened considerably as all the bitter astringent notes disappeared. This wine became inoffensive and boring when it opened up. I’ll leave my rating at 8.7. Double meh.

Apr 23rd, 2024
Paco Suro

Paco had this a year ago

Paco had this a year ago

Nov 6th, 2023
Por La Vida

Por had this 3 years ago

Por had this 3 years ago

May 20th, 2022
Derrick Kelley

Derrick had this 7 years ago

Derrick had this 7 years ago

Jun 8th, 2018