Krug

Brut Champagne Blend

9.346 ratings
9.420 pro ratings
Champagne, France
Champagne Blend
Squash & Root Vegetables, Meaty & Oily Fish, Shellfish, Crab & Lobster, Cake & Cream, Soft Cheese, Hard Cheese, Salads & Greens, Salami & Prosciutto, Pork, Fish, Chicken, Duck, Onion, Shallot, Garlic, Nuts & Seeds, Fruit & Berries, Beans & Peas, Exotic Spices, Turkey, Pungent Cheese, Shellfish, Oyster
Top Notes For
Alberto Cdm

Better few years ago

Better few years ago

Oct 16th, 2025
Lee Pitofsky

For the caviar

For the caviar

Sep 17th, 2023
Alex Lallos

Owner No Limit Fine Wines, Private Wine Consultant

9.5

Freaking fabulous!

Freaking fabulous!

Jun 10th, 2022
Aaron Tan

"You didn't know Krug's oxidative?"

While I've had my fair share of Krug over the years, I've never found any as oxidative as this 06' (save for a few suspect bottles), which led me to proclaim that the bottle was less-than-pristine. Normally this would not have been strange given the abysmal state of cold chain in Malaysia, but GL was quick to rebut with the statement above.

He's had far more Krug than I have you see - decades, instead of years - so he may well be right here. It could have been the vintage, or my palate, or just needed more air to blossom - whatever the case, this certainly fell below expectations. Sure it was dense and quite linear, and Krug does indeed lie in the school of oxidative champagnes, but this just lacked the balancing freshness that one would expect from a producer of this caliber. The straw that broke the camel's back for me was a distinct musky note that I see so often in ill-stored whites, and abhor. So the real question is - was GL right? Is this a typical Krug 06'? I believe another specimen is required to draw proper judgement.

"You didn't know Krug's oxidative?"

While I've had my fair share of Krug over the years, I've never found any as oxidative as this 06' (save for a few suspect bottles), which led me to proclaim that the bottle was less-than-pristine. Normally this would not have been strange given the abysmal state of cold chain in Malaysia, but GL was quick to rebut with the statement above.

He's had far more Krug than I have you see - decades, instead of years - so he may well be right here. It could have been the vintage, or my palate, or just needed more air to blossom - whatever the case, this certainly fell below expectations. Sure it was dense and quite linear, and Krug does indeed lie in the school of oxidative champagnes, but this just lacked the balancing freshness that one would expect from a producer of this caliber. The straw that broke the camel's back for me was a distinct musky note that I see so often in ill-stored whites, and abhor. So the real question is - was GL right? Is this a typical Krug 06'? I believe another specimen is required to draw proper judgement.

Feb 8th, 2022
jesus g

Hospitality Schramsberg Vineyards

9.3

Needs time

Needs time

Jan 20th, 2022
Conrad Green

Bright and clear. Lovely structure with sweet edges and length. Excellent.

Bright and clear. Lovely structure with sweet edges and length. Excellent.

Dec 26th, 2021
Jeremy Shanker

Sommelier at RN74

9.4

Champagne at its most powerful. Gingersnap, red apple, brioche.

Champagne at its most powerful. Gingersnap, red apple, brioche.

Sep 28th, 2021
Mike R
9.4

Krug vintage champagne- enough said

Krug vintage champagne- enough said

Jun 13th, 2021
Jason Gallo-Gaffner

How can you dislike krug?

How can you dislike krug?

Jan 4th, 2021
Lee Pitofsky

Midnight bar bubbles at Crown Shy 🤙🏻

Midnight bar bubbles at Crown Shy 🤙🏻

Mar 5th, 2020