Freek Welter

9.0

@delectable this is barbera d’asti Collejato 2022 — a month ago

Ming L

9.1

Estate-grown Nebbiolo from a Barolo cru, this is old-school Riserva showing tightly wound red fruit, dried rose, tar, and earthy autumn leaf notes with firm tannins. Need times. Lacking a bit of depth for a Riserva - could be a result of a weak vintage.
46 months in used French and Slovakia vertical vat. — 4 months ago

Lori Eickleberry

8.9

1997 vintage. Plenty of time to decant and it opened to a very complex and balanced wine. Cherry, olive, green pepper, leather, hay, eucalyptus, earthy with nice minerality. Has an umami character. For me…a little funk of barnyard and brett make it muah! — 2 years ago

Angie Forbes

9.2

Hampton liquor $22? — a month ago

Ming L

8.9

Old school showing restraint and tradition. However, the fruit is a bit muted cherry and takes a backseat to earthy tones of forest floor, leather, and dried herbs. Tannins are firm yet balanced, and the finish carries a touch of tar and rose.
A solid entry level Barolo. — 3 months ago

Steve Ambrusko

9.0

Delicious! — 2 years ago

Daniel P. Drake

9.3

This weekend we opened the 2018 Domenico Clerico Azienda Agricola Di Viberti Giuliana-Monforte D' Alba Barolo.

On the nose there is cherry, raspberry, cranberry, licorice, roses, clay pots and dusty soil.

On the palate there is cherry, raspberry, cranberry, anise, rose hip, leather and dried herbs.

This wine is medium to full bodied medium+ to high acidity and medium+ firm tannins that move into a long red and black fruit leathery finish. Enjoy the weekend and please stay safe and healthy. Nostrovia! 🍷🍷🍷🍷 — 2 years ago

Heather Robinson

8.9

HWT - Eric especially liked it, it was a rich and robust red that went well with food. $122 is pricy though — 2 months ago

Ming L

9.0

Lovely Nebbiolo rose. Fragrant nose with abundance of chalky mineral and seashell salinity. Crisp and refreshing. Just a hot summer day needs. — 4 months ago

Daniel Ciolek

9.0

I usually like Barolo from La Morra but this was somewhat of a dud. Very surprising as 2016 was an excellent year. It was unidimensional from opening to a few hours later. Shy nose, dark cherry, licorice and more mineral than undergrowth on the palate, and the finish was the highlight with a long leathery finish where hints of spice finally appeared. Maybe an off bottle given the ratings?
Different bottle a couple years later in September 2025 - much better - the prior bottle must have bern a bad bottle. This bottle has all the smoothness spice earth and cherry- based complexity that reflects the excellent 2016 vintage. Still a bit of grippy tannins at the finish. Very happy with this bottle. — 2 years ago