Ron Siegel

9.3

This was rich with good intensity. Consistent with my prior notes — 8 days ago

Mark

9.0

Very nice grower producer, balanced between light and fresh and structure — 2 months ago

Robert Ahlstrom

9.3

Deep inky brick, slow dark legs, plums and chocolate, subtle tannins and beautiful mouthfeel, love a great Pomerol Merlot! — 3 months ago

Mackenzie Svee

9.6

Honeydew and lemon on the nose, dry minerality and brioche on the palate, short aftertaste — 4 months ago

Ron Siegel

9.3

This was showing lemon, green apple with wet stone, saline & white flower. Really nice! — 15 days ago

Ron Siegel

9.2

Just a great wine purchased at under $40 with good intensity showing lots of lemon, citrus, mineral & racy acid — 3 months ago

Rob Krapf

9.5

Good minerality, clean and crisp with bold oomph — 3 months ago

with Tom

Alvaro Bustillos

9.4

Lalo jaime diego orlando adolfo MAG — 15 days ago

Jay Kline

9.2

Opened just prior to service; enjoyed over the course of a few hours. As far as I know, this was the first commercially released vintage of La Fleur de Boüard but others may be able to confirm or deny that. The 2000 pours a deep garnet color with an opaque core; medium+ viscosity with moderate staining of the tears. On the nose, the wine is developing with notes of ripe dark fruits: back plums, cassis, pipe tobacco, Flintstones vitamins, purple flowers, dried green herbs organic earth and fine baking spices. “Yabba dabba doo!” On the palate, the wine is dry with medium+ tannins and medium+ acid. Confirming the notes from the nose. The finish is medium+. Gosh, this is in a really lovely place right now; very well balanced! Thank Andy! Drink now through 2040. — a month ago

Matthew Cohen

8.9

Nose: hint white flowers.

Palate: good fruit. Less precise. Tiny Hint of chemical.

$16.67 — 3 months ago