Pings your nostrils with sequence of subtle vibrations at hummingbird frequency. Lime, orange blossom, burnt match. Then a slow slip into my absolute favorite honeyed dimension. I love when honey shows up - it's one of my favorite notes in wine. Here it changes the direction from steely stern face to a textured viscous warm smirk. — 3 years ago
Ghost ship on the nose.
Damp hull.
Lichen./ wet stone.
Seawater./ oyster shell
Cranberry./ black tea sequence — 5 years ago
Enjoying a glass of wine with my soon to be husband while playing Sequence while snacking on a charcuterie board! 🍷 Xo — 3 years ago
Underwhelmed. Such great promise after smelling well integrated oak with crisp red fruit aroma, which foreshadowed great promise....not so. Not a bad wine but rather single note, nothing evolved while carefully sipping it. Lingering, lasting finish for sure. But that felt like watching a pretty boring fire work show with more of the same in rapid sequence during the grand finally. — 5 years ago
Drank with mom and Kim.
Played sequence! — 3 years ago
Andrew Cullimoredata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/16061/16061317aec799e0dac664c5d423069f067e3ea2" alt="Premium Badge Premium Badge"
Flight 4 , wine 2. This was quite a difficult wine to read at first , again quite closed , mineral and tobacco edged . Dark fruits. On the palate rounder than expected , good richness and balance , dark cherry , blackberry fruit . Good rounded tannin and ok length . Quite obviously Bordeaux in the context of this tasting , though I had this as the Lynch Bages 1982 when it was actually the Brane Cantenac 1986 …..I give up ! 90
This was an interesting , though challenging tasting , all served blind in flights of 2 wines , 3 flights of 1 Napa and 1 Bordeaux and 1 of 2 Bordeaux; served in a random sequence . The fact that at least a couple of wines were not pristine didn’t help , though if you will taste 8 , 40 year old wines that is probably par for the course . I found it relatively easy to spot whether what was in the glass was Napa or Bordeaux but didn’t actually get a single wine completely correct ! Probably overall the winner of the tasting was Napa (won the 3 rounds 2-1) as they had more suave polished , rounded personalities. Many put the wines the wrong way round , imagining that Napa was Bordeaux etc. The 1982s in general showed poorly too much funk and brett on the Lynch and Talbot but the Duhart showed surprisingly well . The 86s both showed pretty well and equalled the Dominus (even though I didn’t think we had a pristine bottle) . The Montelena was enjoyable , though was the first to oxidise whilst the Inglenook was the biggest positive surprise , still drinking surprisingly well at 47 . — 19 hours ago