Tyler Felous

9.0

Have not had an “a-ha” moment with these wines and hence, have stopped buying. What am I missing? — a month ago

Joan Ziegler

9.1

Truly French tiny bubbles. Celebrating at our Christmas party with friends & colleagues- enjoyed by all. Brioche. — 9 months ago

Robert Stackowiak

9.4

Great balance. Subtle apple on the palate. Tiny bubbles as you would expect in a premium champagne. December 2024. — 10 months ago

Peter James

9.0

BHM Wine Tasting @ Netflix — 3 years ago

Michael

8.9

Pairs well with their pretzel sticks. Very light with hints of white and young green grapes. — 2 months ago

Sipping Fine Wine

9.2

Medium lemon color, aromas of stone and citrus fruits with floral, honey and mineral notes. On the palate flavors of apple, peach and pear with citrus and floral wrapped in a nutty spice. Medium+ finish, lively acidity, ending with fruit, spice and savory citrus character. 230 cases, good now! — 5 months ago

J Choi

9.5

Favorite house nv — 2 years ago

David White

9.1

Excellent Central Otago Pinot Noir, 2022 with fruit and acidity balance berry flavours and long finish.
— 2 months ago

Jalyn Warren

9.0

Nice and light — 10 months ago

Jay Kline

9.7

Presented double-blind. The wine appears straw in color with medium viscosity and, apparently, there lots of tiny bubbles so there are signs of gas, LOL. On the nose, the wine is developing with heady notes of ripe orchard fruit, red forest berries, marzipan, lemon curd, fresh brioche. On the palate, the wine is dry with high acidity. Confirming the notes from the nose. The finish lasts for an eternity. The texture is ever so creamy. Wow…well, I was drinking something special. Had to be Champagne. Maybe vintage? Maybe a tête de cuvée? The style was similar to Krug. Called Champagne from a producer like Krug. OMG…the 1996 Vintage Brut?! Sheesh…someone was feeling generous! Admitted, I don’t often get to drink vintage Krug (for many hundreds of reasons!) so my experience is obviously limited. However, there’s clearly no question in this being true to house style and, now that I know the vintage, this is showing why 1996 is so special. As others have noted, this is fresher than the 1995 I had some months ago (though, that was very special too) and had greater acid. I would like to think this provides a crystal ball for the 2008 vintage that is sure to follow a similar trajectory. Drinking very fine indeed, right now and should continue to do so through 2046…depending on how you like to drink your Champagne. — 10 months ago