David Ferguson

10

Great from first sip — 10 days ago

Scott@Mister A’s-San Diego

9.4

1989 vintage. Opened but not decanted. Just got a (generous) side sample of this as I was entrenched with the weekly wine rep tastings. Tasted after 30 mins and one hour after opening. Definitely bretty (as expected) for the first tastes but that mostly dissipated by the end of the glass. Light-medium body with mostly bowed tannins initially. Longer it remained in the glass, the more the tannins came out to frolic. Still plenty of structure, fruit and front-palate intrigue (usually hidden/buried by tannins). Not improving at this point but-depending on storage and/or bottle size-still more than viable and deserving of massive respect. 01.29.25. — a month ago

Ed Chin

9.3

Impressive right now and can only get better. Still primary but still too young g at this point for any nuance. — 4 months ago

Lisa McKinnon

9.2

Hugo’s Cellar has a great wine list! This one is a more fruit forward Cab, but not one that overpowers filet. — 20 hours ago

Paul Damaske

9.1

Yummy, light, cherries — 2 months ago

Bryce Rethwisch

9.0

It was fine. Would drink it again. — 4 months ago

Turd Ferguson

9.1

A bit reductive/flinty. Textural, mineral. Not giving up much fruit. High acid. Thankfully none of that cheap NZ gooseberry or cat piss. Pretty nice now with food. I think it I’ll save my next bottle until 2026. — 6 months ago

Eric Urbani

9.2

Love the special character of these South African Chards — 2 months ago

Jacqui

9.5

Fruity and refreshing after a study sesh 😎 — 3 months ago

Alan Johnston

9.2

3.0. A good Marlboro Sauvignon Blanc, but a little dull. On sale for $22.99, usually $26.99. — 4 months ago